After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these types of systems. Via lie recognition tools analyzed at the line to a system for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being used in asylum applications. This article explores just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series www.ascella-llc.com/ of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their particular capacity to steer these devices and to go after their right for security.
It also displays how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering them from being able to view the stations of safeguards. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of these technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: although they help to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.